Tuesday, October 27, 2015

The Analysis of Mind

This book has grown out of an attempt to harmonize two different tendencies, one in psychology, the other in physics, with both of which I find myself in sympathy, although at first sight they might seem inconsistent. On the one hand, many psychologists, especially those of the behaviourist school, tend to adopt what is essentially a materialistic position, as a matter of method if not of metaphysics. They make psychology increasingly dependent on physiology and external observation, and tend to think of matter as something much more solid and indubitable than mind. Meanwhile the physicists, especially Einstein and other exponents of the theory of relativity, have been making "matter" less and less material. Their world consists of "events," from which "matter" is derived by a logical construction. I think that what has permanent value in the outlook of the behaviourists is the feeling that physics is the most fundamental science at present in existence. But this position cannot be called materialistic, if, as seems to be the case, physics does not assume the existence of matter.

Tha Zan
Mind Developer
Rated: 4 Star

Jazz Ducusin
Great app
Rated: 5 Star

A Google User
Nothing to say
Rated: 5 Star

Reagan Nyadimo
Very educative
Rated: 5 Star

Wesley Loveless
Thank you !!
Rated: 5 Star

Dipankar Barman
Great book.
Rated: 5 Star

No comments:

Post a Comment